Pandemia de Covid-19: ¿Cuál es la verdad?

Esta pandemia, y la respuesta draconiana a ella, nunca parecen desaparecer, tal vez por diseño. Sin embargo, debido a que hay tanto en juego, las personas necesitan escuchar todos los datos críticos disponibles.

Nunca he visto un esfuerzo tan enorme por parte del gobierno, las burocracias médicas, los medios de comunicación, las instituciones privadas e incluso las instituciones médicas para evitar que las opiniones disidentes se discutan abiertamente, incluso las opiniones de científicos altamente calificados en todos los campos de la medicina, desde epidemiología, enfermedades infecciosas, virología, patología e ingeniería de equipos de protección. Esto incluye la eliminación de las licencias de médicos disidentes, la pérdida de privilegios hospitalarios y la retractación de artículos publicados y revisados por pares de la literatura médica. [34,36] La ciencia, como cualquier verdadero científico debería saber, solo puede avanzar mediante una discusión abierta de todos los puntos de vista, especialmente los puntos de vista disidentes. La ciencia avanza desafiando hipótesis y teorías prevalecientes. Los puntos de vista institucionalizados sofocan el avance científico y, especialmente en medicina clínica, en última instancia dañarán a las personas. Estos puntos de vista rígidos se vuelven ideológicos en el sentido de que cualquier disidencia de los detalles de la ortodoxia constituye una causa de un ataque vicioso y rechazo. [17]

En el centro de toda práctica médica está el concepto de consentimiento informado. No se debe administrar ni realizar ninguna prescripción, procedimiento, cirugía o vacuna sin avisar al paciente, en cuanto a los posibles riesgos y beneficios. De acuerdo con el principio de consentimiento informado, un paciente, o en este caso, el público en general, debe ser informado de las indicaciones para el tratamiento, la eficacia del tratamiento, las posibles alternativas disponibles al tratamiento propuesto y, lo que es más importante, todos los posibles efectos secundarios y complicaciones, ya sean agudas o a largo plazo. Esto es especialmente cierto para procedimientos nuevos y relativamente no probados. Por ejemplo, se ha estimado que para un nuevo tipo de vacuna o especialmente tratamiento genético, se requiere un mínimo de 10 años de prueba.

¿QUÉ ES EL CONSENTIMIENTO INFORMADO: LA VACUNA Y EL SISTEMA INMUNOLÓGICO?

La causa más común de demandas por negligencia médica es un médico o institución que no proporciona consentimiento informado antes de iniciar el tratamiento. No solo se nos niega el consentimiento informado, sino que también se ha lanzado una guerra por parte de personas e instituciones poderosas, incluso gobiernos, para evitar que se difunda información vital. [29]

Desafortunadamente, las principales instituciones están ocultando deliberadamente datos esenciales y alterando los datos disponibles dentro de los círculos oficiales para convencer al público de que solo hay una solución para esta llamada pandemia: la vacunación con agentes biológicos prácticamente no probados.

El apagón de información esencial se ha vuelto tan intenso que los virólogos altamente respetados, especialistas en enfermedades infecciosas e incluso la persona que desarrolló la tecnología de las "vacunas" de ARN mensajero (ARNm) han sido prohibidos en las redes sociales, los medios de comunicación y otras fuentes de contacto con el público en general.

El esfuerzo de los promotores de vacunas se ha vuelto tan intenso que se están arruinando reputaciones, se destruyen carreras e incluso se reciben amenazas de muerte, como le sucedió al ex jefe de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC), el Dr. Robert Redfield.

No se permite ninguna voz disidente, sin importar cuán bien calificada sea, y respaldada por datos científicos sólidos. Una cosa que mantiene el pubis en la oscuridad es que la mayoría de las personas prácticamente no tienen comprensión de los complejos temas de inmunología, virología, epidemiología o patología de enfermedades infecciosas. Para las personas no capacitadas en estas áreas, todo parece bastante simple: hay un brote de enfermedad, se hace una vacuna contra la enfermedad, las personas se vuelven inmunes y todo está bien.

Unfortunately, because of the incredible complexity of the immune system, it does not always work like that. In fact, we are now learning that vaccines, under certain conditions, can make things much worse for the vaccinated.[65,91,94] However, these COVID shots are not actually vaccines — they are genetic biological agents that to this day remain largely untested. (They were tested for only 2 months before given Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] approval for public use.) That means if you take them, you become the guinea pig.

Some will respond that Pfizer did test its vaccine before being released. According to their information, over 11,000 people were given the vaccine and carefully followed. Afterward they announced the vaccine as 95% effective and quite safe. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) interviewed several women who participated in the so-called pre-release study.[76] They each in turn had similar stories — Pfizer would not return most of their calls when they experienced serious side effects. They also stated that they signed an agreement that stated should they experience complications Pfizer would assume all cost of their medical care. Several of the ladies stated that Pfizer did not pay a cent of their medical expenses, which ran into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Despite the recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that these companies should test the vaccine for at least 2 years, this suggestion was ignored by Pfizer and Moderna.

WHAT IS A MRNA VACCINE AND HOW DOES IT WORK?

As noted, these new products are not in the strict sense traditional “vaccines,” which use either a part of a whole virus or bacteria combined with very powerful immune stimulant compounds called immune adjuvants.

The mRNA vaccines, first developed in the 1980s by Dr. Robert Malone, utilizes a complex technique that employs an artificially constructed mRNA molecule. The idea is that the RNA produces the desired antigen. In this case, it produces the spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that causes COVID-19 infection. Ironically, that is the very part of the virus that causes damage in people, in particular acting as a neurotoxic molecule.[39] However, injecting mRNA by itself won’t work because the body contains an enzyme that would quickly destroy it.

To prevent this, Dr. Malone created a nanolipid carrier that is basically like a nanosized sac that contains the mRNA (resembles an artificial exosome).[50] This special carrier sac is incredibly small — about the size of the virus.[63]

We’ve been told that the carrier sac (the nanolipid carrier) is destroyed within a few days, thus preventing the body from continuously producing the deadly spike protein. Keep in mind, the principal way the virus itself causes damage is through its spike protein — the same one being reproduced in large amounts all over a person’s body by the mRNA in the vaccine. However, the truth is that the makers of these biological agents added polyethylene glycol to protect the nanolipid carrier so it would last much longer in the body — thus allowing the mRNA to produce far more spike protein for a much longer period. In fact, we don’t know how long the nanolipid/mRNA package lasts. The generated spike proteins may last months, years, or even a lifetime.

En resumen: Las "vacunas" consisten en ARNm sintetizado artificialmente encapsulado dentro de un saco protector (portador de nanolípidos). El ARNm dentro del saco produce y libera una cantidad cada vez mayor de la destructiva proteína espiga en su cuerpo, en cualquier lugar donde se deposite el portador de nanolípidos. Esta es la parte crítica de la historia. Nos dijeron que este saco de ARNm permanece en el sitio de inyección en el brazo de la persona, produciendo continuamente la proteína espiga. Teóricamente, su cuerpo puede producir anticuerpos contra la proteína espiga, supuestamente protegiéndolo de la infección por COVID-19.

El Dr. Malone y otros descubrieron que Pfizer había realizado en secreto un estudio de biodistribución, para ver dónde iba el portador de nanolípidos después de ser inyectado en la extremidad del receptor de la vacuna. Se utilizó una demanda por Libertad de Información para obtener una copia de este estudio realizado en secreto por Pfizer. Los resultados fueron bastante reveladores y muy aterradores.

Descubrieron que, en lugar de permanecer en el sitio de la inyección (generalmente la región brazo-deltoides), estos portadores de nanolípidos que contienen ARNm ingresaron rápidamente al torrente sanguíneo y se distribuyeron por todo el cuerpo, incluido el cerebro. [49]

La mayor concentración de portadores de nanolípidos inyectados se encontró en los ovarios de las mujeres. [75] La segunda concentración más alta se produjo dentro de la médula ósea. También se observaron altas concentraciones en el hígado, los ganglios linfáticos y el bazo. De hecho, los estudios que demostraron los portadores de nanolípidos se distribuyeron entre varios tejidos y órganos, incluyendo:

• Pulmones
• Corazón
• Revestimiento de los vasos sanguíneos
• Musculatura
• Médula espinal
• Cerebro
• Riñones.

LOS EFECTOS SECUNDARIOS DE LAS VACUNAS GENÉTICAS Y LOS TRATAMIENTOS TEMPRANOS

Esta distribución podría explicar algunas de las complicaciones devastadoras que se informan que involucran varios sistemas de órganos en personas que han recibido las vacunas COVID. Por ejemplo, la infiltración del corazón explica el creciente número de casos de miocarditis (inflamación del músculo cardíaco) que se reportan. Se han producido más de 2.700 casos de inflamación cardíaca inducida por la vacuna (miocarditis y pericarditis) en todos los grupos de edad. [68] Entre las edades de 12 a 17 años, hubo 520 notificaciones de miocarditis y pericarditis. Estos jóvenes enfrentan insuficiencia cardíaca progresiva, arritmias y otros problemas cardíacos más adelante en sus vidas. Durante este mismo período, se reportaron 16.310 muertes, un aumento de 373 con respecto a la semana anterior. Estos números son mucho más altos que los que se observan con la infección viral en sí o asociados con otras vacunas.

Debido a que los portadores de nanolípidos productores de proteínas espiga se alojan dentro de órganos y tejidos, el sistema inmunitario no puede responder de manera eficiente para prevenir daños y puede ser responsable de gran parte del daño como efecto de lesión del espectador. Para las vacunas que utilizan dos inyecciones, el efecto de cebado de la primera dosis casi aseguraría un aumento del daño, posiblemente por inmunoexcitotoxicidad. [15,16]

Con algunos de estos portadores de nanolípidos ahora alojados dentro de las células, cualquier intento del sistema inmune de neutralizarlos causará un daño considerable no solo a esas células, sino a una amplia zona de células a su alrededor. Esto se conoce como "daño del espectador".

Esencialmente, una vez que las personas estén vacunadas, tendrán la proteína espiga que se produce en todas partes de sus cuerpos. Además, estudios recientes confirman que es la proteína espiga la que causa el daño de COVID. Es decir, es tóxico.

Por supuesto, ahora sabemos que muy pocas personas mueren realmente a causa de la infección por el propio virus; Mueren de una reacción exagerada dramática del sistema inmunológico, la llamada tormenta de citoquinas, que puede ocurrir en cualquier órgano o tejido. El CDC admitió recientemente que solo 10,500 personas en los Estados Unidos murieron por el virus en sí. La mayoría ha muerto por complicaciones de su condición médica crónica o en relación con la obesidad.

De hecho, los estudios han demostrado que incluso cuando la cantidad de virus en el cuerpo es alta, la mayoría de las personas infectadas con COVID tienen pocos síntomas o tienen una reacción moderada, similar a otras infecciones virales. Dentro de ocho a 11 días, mejoran.

By this time, most, if not all the viruses, are no longer viable.[40,86,98] However, the dead viruses remain within the tissues, mainly in the lungs, where they stimulate the immune system to overreact — a mechanism, as stated, we refer to as a cytokine storm. Dead viruses can stimulate the immune system just as well as live viruses.

Studies of patients at this cytokine storm stage have shown that their breath contains no live viruses. Thus, wearing a mask is useless, and it impairs the patient’s ability to get sufficient oxygen. Ironically, putting these patients on a ventilator (respirator) dramatically increases the death rate. It’s thought that by using positive pressure to force the lung to work, the ventilator further damages the already severely damaged lungs.

The greatest success in saving such patients occurs when strong anti-inflammatory medications — such as high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous vitamin C, and Ivermectin are used.[45] In fact, in 27 studies conducted all over the world, Ivermectin drastically cut the death rate from COVID-19, even in the most severe and advanced cases.[4]

VACCINES MAY INCREASE THE SEVERITY OF COVID SYMPTOMS AND OVERREACTION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

The difference between getting infected with the virus and exposure to the vaccine is that in the former case only people with age-related frailty, several chronic illnesses, immune deficiencies, and people with other immune-suppressing disorders are at any substantial risk from COVID-19. That is no more than 5% of the population.

Severe disease or death in a healthy person below age 40 is extremely rare, occurring <0.01% of the time. But unlike natural infection, the vaccine — while still dangerous to those who are immune-suppressed — also does serious damage to young people, even if they’re healthy. The majority of deaths associated with the vaccines are among the aged population, with the average age being 73.1 years.

As noted, we’ve seen a dramatic rise in cases of myocarditis in the vaccinated young, along with other serious injuries and deaths. This is happening because the nanolipid carrier of the mRNA travels directly to the heart, triggering intense inflammation in their heart muscle.[59] As also noted, this process could result in the production of the spike proteins for months, years, or even for a lifetime. The nanolipid carrier has been shown to enter the brain, liver, spleen, lymph nodes, and kidneys. Another reaction to these vaccines is what’s called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a common reaction observed with other types of vaccines.[46,92] With ADE, exposure to the wild-type virus in the vaccinated person can trigger a much more pathological damaging effect than in the unvaccinated person.

Because the COVID vaccines trigger a dramatic increase in antibody production, ADE becomes much more likely. Not only does this result in an increase in severity of symptoms if a vaccinated person is exposed to the natural virus in the future, but the virus also reproduces faster and becomes more pathogenic, meaning the severity of a vaccinated person’s illness is worse.

The H1N1 flu vaccine increased the risk of death for those who were vaccinated when they were exposed to the flu virus.[6] We see the same phenomenon with these COVID “vaccines,” and many other types of vaccines. It may be that some of the hospitalizations and deaths now being seen are not due to a so-called “Delta variant,” but rather are caused by the vaccines themselves.[55,89,90]

ARE THE NEW WAVES OF INFECTION REAL? IS TESTING FOR COVID-19 ACCURATE?

The majority of the testing for COVID infection has been performed using what is called a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in which a person’s nose or sometimes throat is swabbed for evidence of viral genetic material. The inventor of this test stated that no clinical infection can be diagnosed using the PCR test alone. Yet the CDC used this test to imply that tens of millions of Americans were infected with COVID-19.

We have now learned that the test does not identify the whole virus, just a segment. In addition, many other viruses, bacteria, and even some things that are not microorganisms at all can yield a positive test. For instance, the president of Tanzania secretly had a sheep, a goat, and a pawpaw (a type of fruit) tested using PCR by his health department.[60] The goat and the pawpaw both tested positive.

Recently, the CDC announced that the PCR test would no longer be used because they discovered that it cross-reacts with the influenza virus, meaning virtually all influenza infections in the last flu season could have been diagnosed as COVID-19. This explains why there were only a few hundred flu cases reported in the entire U.S. this past season — a number unprecedented in modern times. (The CDC claims that each year there are about 30,000 deaths from the flu and over 300,000 hospital admissions).

Cycles of the PCR test are run to amplify its sensitivity, and it is known that doing more than 30 cycles increases the likelihood of the test being falsely positive. Yet the CDC recommended that all labs perform 40 or more cycles, which would have meant that around 97% of positive tests were, in fact, negative. That is, the person tested most likely did not have a COVID infection.

Combined with the lack of specificity of the PCR test, fear mongering by the media and the CDC greatly exaggerated the impact of the first wave of the COVID outbreak. The same is almost certainly true with the new Delta variant. Virologists emphasize that the more people who are vaccinated, the more variants will appear.[20] However, while the variants are more contagious, they are less harmful. This is the nature of virus mutations.

WHO ARE THE SUPERSPREADERS OF THE VIRUS?

In fact, based on the observation that the vaccinated have very high titers of virus in their nasopharynx, according to mRNA technology developer Dr. Robert Malone, it is the vaccinated who are more likely spreading the new variant, as they remain asymptomatic longer than an unvaccinated person.[47] Viral titers (concentrations) were found to be very high in the noses of vaccinated as well as infected unvaccinated people. If the “vaccine” worked, they should have found none or extremely small amounts of the virus.

The average age of death from COVID-19 is around 75 years (95% occurred over age 65 years). Moreover, the highest death rate among vaccinated people is in the same age group — the very ones the vaccines are supposed to protect.

The most egregious form of this fear mongering is to imply that the Delta variant infections are all in the unvaccinated. This is not true. A study in Scotland, for example, found that 87% of Delta variant cases occurred in the fully vaccinated.[27] Similar findings were reported in the United Kingdom and Israel. Moreover, a recent report released by the CDC found that 74% of the cases in a Cape Cod, Massachusetts cluster were among vaccinated individuals.[54] Most of these people were reported to have the Delta variant.

WHAT ARE THE TRUE NUMBERS?

The vaccines for COVID-19 stand to make more money for their developers than any other vaccines at any time in history. Those same companies also wield enormous financial power and influence in the media, medical journals, medical societies (such as the American Medical Association), hospitals, research institutions, and government bureaucracies (such as the National Institutes of Health [NIH]). Moreover, of course, they donate vast sums to elected officials.

We are witnessing an unprecedented attack on free speech directed at anyone who challenges pro-vaccine propaganda, including virologists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, and pulmonologists. Dr. Michael Yeadon, ex-chief science officer for Pfizer; a whistleblower from Moderna; Dr. Robert Malone, the developer of the mRNA vaccine technique; and other highly qualified scientists have been banned from social media and the mainstream news outlets for speaking out. Why? Because they might convince people that these vaccines are dangerous, and that they should be halted immediately.

There is growing evidence that government agencies are hiding the true number seriously injured and killed by these vaccines. A lawsuit has been filed in Alabama federal court by attorney Thomas Renz based on sworn testimony of a government whistleblower. This person testified under oath that, according to actual government records from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 45,000 people have died after getting the vaccine.[5]

This refers to data from just one government system reporting to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The real number of dead could be much higher.

Recall that at the height of the “pandemic,” about 50% of all deaths occurred in nursing homes and that government officials in several states had deliberately placed infected patients in these high- risk facilities.

Where are the highest rates of vaccine-related deaths now occurring? Nursing homes and among the elderly — the very ones we are supposed to be protecting. In some places, nursing home death rates secondary to the vaccines (most of which occur within 2 days of being vaccinated) equal or exceed the rate of deaths caused by the virus itself. Some nursing homes have reported vaccine-related death rates of 30% or higher. The vaccines were meant to protect the most vulnerable, but now those individuals are the ones dying and being injured by the vaccine itself.

ATTACKING THE REAL CURES

As bad as all this is, what’s worse in the alignment of forces being used to prevent safe methods from being used to stop this virus. When it was revealed that early use of hydroxychloroquine could significantly reduce the severity of the disease and prevent the need for a ventilator, reports immediately surfaced from government agencies declaring that the drug was of no use, was dangerous, and should not be used. This occurred despite reports of hydroxychloroquine’s benefits from doctors actually treating patients. In some states, prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine were banned. We see the same thing with Ivermectin, another highly effective and safe medication.[45]

Cada vez que se descubría un tratamiento que mejoraba los resultados de los pacientes con COVID o prevenía la transmisión del virus, las fuerzas intervenían para evitar que se usara el tratamiento.

Un número creciente de tratamientos naturales que podrían haber evitado la propagación de este virus, incluyendo la mayoría de las infecciones graves, han sido bloqueados por estos controladores. Increíblemente, se aprobó una ley que impedía que los médicos clínicos sugirieran tales tratamientos. La curcumina, baicalina, apigenina, luteolina, EGCG, mioinositol, ashwagandha, magnesio, ácido docosahexaenoico / ácido eicosapentaenoico, alta dosis IV de vitamina C, vitamina D3, melatonina, astrágalo, beta-glucano, extractos de hongos y ashwagandha mejoran la inmunidad de una persona, previniendo así la infección. [2,8,12,13,28,35,37,42,48,51,52,61,67,69,70,73,80,84,87,88,96,97]

Como he escrito, se ha demostrado que la curcumina reduce drásticamente el daño a los pulmones causado por tormentas de citoquinas en animales experimentales de un modelo de sepsis. La nano-curcumina, al ser mucho mejor absorbida, debería ser aún más efectiva.

Numerosos estudios han demostrado que el arma inmune primaria contra todos los virus son las células T citotóxicas. El astrágalo mejora significativamente la producción del cuerpo de estas células inmunes. [24,31]

Recientemente publiqué un artículo sobre cómo la inmunoexcitotoxicidad juega un papel importante en las reacciones de tormenta de citoquinas. [14] Básicamente, las citocinas inflamatorias activan los receptores de glutamato NMDA dentro de las células epiteliales y endoteliales pulmonares, así como las células inmunitarias, lo que lleva a la destrucción grave del tejido pulmonar y a la fuga macroscópica de suero hacia los alvéolos. En el artículo, noté que la dieta típica estadounidense contiene niveles muy altos de glutamato y otros aditivos excitotóxicos. [14] Además, las soluciones de alimentación por sonda que se usan en los hospitales contienen niveles altos de glutamato. Este hecho es completamente ignorado por los médicos que tratan a pacientes con COVID.

El Dr. Pierre Kory, fundador de Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), hizo una serie de descubrimientos que mejoraron drásticamente la supervivencia de los pacientes con casos graves de COVID-19. A diferencia de muchos de los defensores de la vacuna solamente, el Dr. Kory ha pasado su vida profesional tratando a algunos de los más enfermos en entornos de unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI), incluidos cientos de pacientes con COVID. Pero cada descubrimiento que hizo fue intensamente resistido y rechazado por la élite médica y las burocracias, al menos hasta que la prueba se volvió tan abrumadora que ya no podían negarla. Mientras tanto, miles murieron como resultado de la intransigencia del controlador de élite. Existe evidencia de que el tratamiento temprano, antes de que ocurra el deterioro, puede reducir la hospitalización en un 85 por ciento. [53]

EL EXTRAÑO CASO DE LA IVERMECTINA

El Dr. Kory también descubrió que la ivermectina, un medicamento utilizado para tratar infecciones parasitarias, era quizás una de las armas más poderosas que poseemos en la batalla contra COVID-19, reduciendo la tasa de mortalidad de pacientes incluso muy enfermos a tal grado que se ha llamado un milagro médico. [9,21,41,44]

El Dr. Kory y sus colegas, todos expertos en enfermedades pulmonares e infecciosas muy respetados y frecuentemente citados, elaboraron un protocolo utilizando este medicamento seguro y económico y otros compuestos. (Alianza FLCCC. www.flccc.net.) Su protocolo ahora se ha utilizado en todo el mundo, pero no en los Estados Unidos. Las muertes y los casos que requieren hospitalización en países que han usado ivermectina, incluidos México, India, Brasil, Eslovaquia, República Checa, Paraguay, Perú, Argentina, Zimbabwe y las principales ciudades de otros países, se han reducido dramática y rápidamente. Además, se han acortado los tiempos de recuperación, se ha evitado el deterioro del paciente cuando el medicamento se usó temprano y se ha reducido la mortalidad entre los pacientes gravemente enfermos de la UCI.

De hecho, cuando se toma una vez a la semana, se ha demostrado que la ivermectina previene drásticamente la infección por COVID, incluso en trabajadores hospitalarios que están cerca de muchos pacientes enfermos. [12,14] La ivermectina se ha estudiado y ha demostrado ser altamente eficaz en 27 ensayos cuidadosamente controlados que incluyeron 6.612 pacientes; 16 ensayos fueron ensayos aleatorizados, prospectivos y controlados de la más alta calidad. Sin embargo, el establecimiento médico, los promotores de solo vacunas, ha rechazado incluso considerar este medicamento seguro y económico para el tratamiento o la prevención de COVID.

Peor aún, los médicos, así como el público en general, son advertidos por las asociaciones médicas, la FDA y los CDC de no usar ivermectina. [93] En algunos estados, los médicos pueden perder su licencia si escriben una receta para este medicamento que salva vidas, uno que se ha utilizado de manera segura durante los últimos 40 años en todo el mundo como tratamiento para infecciones parasitarias. [33,58] Además de ser un poderoso antiinflamatorio y suprimir la replicación viral, se ha demostrado que la ivermectina inhibe una forma importante de excitotoxicidad observada frente a la inflamación crónica y la activación microglial. [3]

EL PAPEL DE LAS COMPAÑÍAS FARMACÉUTICAS EN LOS TRATAMIENTOS DE COVID-19 Y EL MIEDO

It seems to me, and others, that the pharmaceutical companies making these vaccines don’t want a rival treatment that would cut into their profits. In my opinion, these experimental vaccines are being distributed to the public under a false pretense. According to the EUA act, an experimental treatment cannot be used except in a proven national emergency (pandemic), and only if there are no other available treatments for the condition. Keep in mind that the FDA did not approve the drug presently being used by Pfizer — it is still under EUA regulations as an experimental “vaccine.”

COVID-19 never satisfied the criteria for a pandemic, which requires that the infection must affect a large number of people around the world and have a high mortality rate. This pandemic definition has been used for decades — until this outbreak. The World Health Organization changed the criteria for this “pandemic,” dropping the need for a high death rate.

For the majority of people, the death rate from COVID-19 is lower than that of a mild to moderate flu season. For those under age 40, the death rate is 0.01%; 99.99% of those infected will fully recover. For all ages, the death rate is 0.26%; 99.74% will recover. Those numbers do not justify mandatory vaccination.

On the other hand, eight clinical trials have shown a significant reduction in transmission of COVID-19, even among healthcare workers, with the use of Ivermectin. (FLCCC data).[32] Three of those studies were randomized clinical trials — research of the highest order. Based on these studies, the emergency authorization should be revoked, and vaccination should be stopped before more people are hurt.

MORE NATURAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST COVID

There are a number of other natural treatments and preventatives that could be used by anyone wanting to protect themselves from COVID. The basis for all of these treatments is reducing inflammation, and several natural compounds also restore immune balance. Others are beneficial because they reduce immunoexcitotoxicity, a possible mechanism for cytokine storms.

These compounds include:

• Nano-curcumin
• Nano-quercetin
• N-acetyl-L-cysteine
• Intravenous Vitamin C (high dose)
• Melatonin
• B-complex vitamins
• Hesperidin
• Pterostilbene
• Apigenin
• Magnesium
• Taurine
• Baicalin.

Immune stimulants should only be used during the first 8 days of a COVID infection to prevent aggravating hyperimmune symptoms. This 8-day period is the period when the virus is reproducing very rapidly in the lungs. After 8–11 days, all the viruses are dead, and then the danger is from a hyperimmune reaction to those dead viruses. At this stage the idea is to target inflammation and excitotoxicity, as live viruses are no longer the chief danger in most cases.

Recent studies have shown that a significant number of fully vaccinated people are contracting (supposedly) COVID-19 infections as in Israel, where virtually everyone has been vaccinated. In a carefully conducted study in Vietnam hospitals, it was shown that the vaccinated medical care workers were spreading high levels of viruses to fellow workers, patients, and visitors.[23] A majority of medical centers and hospitals in the United States have mandated vaccines for all employees, even those not in contact with patients. These studies suggest that the medical staff is now a major source of Covid-19 transmission and are acting as superspreaders.

More than 80% of the COVID-variant cases are in fully vaccinated people, and the latest reports indicate the vaccines are ineffective against variants — hence the call for renewed masking. (CDC report).[83] Ivermectin as a preventive measure has a success rate of around 80 to 85% against COVID-19. Some studies have reported no infections in hospital workers taking Ivermectin.

Fear remains the vaccine makers main weapon. The latest strategy is to convince the public that second and third waves of new variants will restore the dangers that have subsided since the original appearance of this virus. All these preventive measures should work against any and all variants. And natural immunity to the original virus appears to give a person full protection against the so-called Delta variant.

This type of cross-immunity occurred with the outbreak of the much deadlier SARS virus, 2002–2004, even with 30% viral mutation variance. The Delta variant differs from the original COVID virus genetically by a mere 1.3%.

UNKNOWN LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS

These vaccines were allowed to be used via the EUA even though only very short-term safety studies (2 months) had been conducted by the manufacturers. Several people who participated in these safety trials stated in a forum held by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) that Pfizer representatives promised them that any medical expenses they incurred as a result of the vaccines would be taken care of by the company. According to this testimony — Pfizer did not follow through on that promise.

Several women suffered serious and apparently permanent damage from taking the test vaccines. Several of these participants, as stated earlier, confirmed that Pfizer representatives would not return their calls, and never paid a cent of their incurred medical expenses. The VAERS data indicates that between December 14, 2020 and October 1, 2021 there were 111,921 reports of serious injuries following the COVID-19 vaccinations, which adds credence to the claims of the pre-release study group as far as a high incidence of serious complications before these vaccines were release upon the public.[68]

The FDA recommended a 2-year intensive study of those who had been vaccinated. The pharmaceutical companies rejected that recommendation. Congressional inquiries have shown that essentially zero studies have been conducted on the millions of American citizens who have taken these vaccines. (As noted in a letter from Senator Johnson to Francis Collins, director of the NIH; Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC; and Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the FDA on July 13, 2021).

So far, we’ve only seen the short-term side effects of these vaccines, which are terrifying enough. However, long-term effects can occur years or even decades following vaccination.

VACCINES AND PREGNANCY

Because the biodistribution study (noted above) demonstrates that the highest concentration of the mRNA-containing nanolipid carrier per gram of tissue in women occurred in the ovaries, meaning every vaccinated woman of reproductive age must now worry about possible infertility or a higher risk of ovarian cancer. (The nanolipid mRNA induces chronic inflammation, the principal cause of most cancers). Data from a corrected preliminary study of vaccinated pregnant women reported in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated that pregnant women vaccinated during the first trimester of their pregnancy (20 weeks), had an 82% chance of losing their baby.[78] Yet the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology announced, as did the CDC, that these vaccines were safe to take during pregnancy. It is known that immune stimulation during the third trimester dramatically increases the risk of the child becoming autistic or developing schizophrenia later in life.[56,64] An extensive literature demonstrates the danger of immune stimulation during pregnancy.[10,11,18,19,62]

We will not know if women vaccinated during their third trimester will have children with a higher risk of becoming autistic for at least 6 years, the usual time span for symptom appearance. Moreover, we will not know if a similarly vaccinated woman will have a schizophrenic child until that child reaches adolescence, which is the usual time of first symptom appearance for that condition.[43] As far as I know, no women or their husbands were warned of this real danger to their children.

No one knows what may happen in the future to these children. By their own admission the vaccine manufacturers conducted no studies with pregnant women prior to the release of these vaccines.

SERIOUS THREAT OF LONG-TERM NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS: OTHER WAYS THE VIRUS CAN INFECT CELLS IN THE BODY

I have written several articles in peer-reviewed medical journals on the effects of excessive vaccination on brain development.[16,18] As noted, immune stimulation during pregnancy can alter how the child’s brain develops. We know that the adult brain is also at risk following excessive immune stimulation.[66,70] One obvious risk is the induction of autoimmune diseases such as lupus, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and multiple sclerosis. Neurodegenerative disease are also a real possibility based on careful research linking peripheral inflammation and central nervous system microglial/macrophage priming and activation.[25,57,74] There is some evidence that the spike protein may be able to trigger several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and most frightening Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.[95] Recently, neurologists have classified at least two cases of neurological disorders in women post COVID-19 vaccination, which they classified as “functional” neurological disorders, suggesting a psychiatric causation. While this could be true in some cases, we must keep in mind that the medical establishment also classified fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and autism spectrum disorders all as “functional” until real neurological explanations were forth coming. In a recent review Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh reviewed a number of possible unintended consequences associated with the mRNA vaccines with strong scientific reasoning.[77] There is also evidence that the mRNA being released can enter the cell nucleus thus altering the DNA of the cell.[81] This would open the possibility of a vertical transfer to offspring.

CROSS REACTION WITH OTHER HUMAN TISSUES: AUTO IMMUNITY

Studies by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and others have confirmed that components of the COVID vaccines cross-react with more than 11 human tissues, meaning autoimmune diseases can develop involving one or all those tissues. The biodistribution study demonstrated that the mRNA-containing nanolipid carrier entered the brain and spinal cord.

USING OTHER VIRUS CARRIERS IN THE BODY TO REACH THE CELLS: EXOSOMES

New studies have demonstrated a very frightening possibility. We are all being told that the virus enters cells using principally the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. But in truth, there is another mechanism: exosomes.[30,38,85] Exosomes are much like the nanolipid carrier used in the vaccines. They are microscopic sacs that contain various components — such as RNA and DNA fragments — that can leave the cell, travel to other cells, enter them, and pass along genetic information. Exosomes are a cell-communication mechanism.

Unfortunately, many viruses can hijack these exosomes, insert their genetic information, and then exit the infected cells and travel to surrounding cells or even distant cells and enter them, thus spreading the infection. Infections by viruses cause the infected cell to produce a tremendous number of exosomes — all containing the viruses’ genetic information. The scary part is that the mRNA “vaccines” are essentially artificial exosomes, each carrying the very part of the virus (the spike protein) that does harm to the body. We have, in essence, traded a natural infection for an artificial one that could be far worse.

OVERREACTION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM STIMULATED BY THE VIRUS; CYTOKINE STORM (IMMUNOEXCITOTOXICITY IN THE BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD)

Un estudio reciente demostró lo peligroso que es cuando los exosomas infectados entran en el cerebro. [57] Estos exosomas entraron en la microglía, las células inmunitarias especiales del cerebro y la principal fuente de excitotoxinas. Los exosomas causaron que la microglía comenzara a generar niveles muy altos de citoquinas inflamatorias y otros mediadores inmunes. Estas sustancias inflamatorias se liberan y causan un daño considerable a las estructuras cerebrales circundantes. Todo esto ocurre con la primera inyección.

Decimos que estas microglías están "preparadas", lo que significa que están en un estado de hiperreactividad, pero aún no han liberado completamente sus citoquinas y excitotoxinas destructivas. La segunda inyección de la vacuna COVID de ARNm activa esta microglía preparada, poniéndolos en un estado extremadamente destructivo en el que liberan altas concentraciones de citoquinas inflamatorias y excitotoxinas. Esto explica por qué las personas tienen peores reacciones a la segunda dosis de la vacuna.

El temor es que estas vacunas podrían desencadenar neurodegeneración dentro de áreas específicas del cerebro, cada una causando un trastorno neurológico particular como la enfermedad de Alzheimer, la enfermedad de Parkinson, la ELA o incluso un trastorno neurológico totalmente nuevo nunca antes visto. [22]

Estas vacunas también pueden desencadenar convulsiones, accidentes cerebrovasculares e incluso trastornos neuropsiquiátricos. Tenga en cuenta que en algunos casos estos trastornos no aparecen durante años o incluso décadas. El Dr. Peter McCullough, profesor de medicina interna y cardiología, citó un caso en el que una mujer perdió toda la memoria después de recibir la primera dosis de la vacuna. [26] También habló de una mujer completamente vacunada que perdió a su bebé después de amamantar. El niño murió de un episodio trombótico/hemorrágico.

Se ha demostrado que el portador de nanolípidos pasa a la leche materna de la madre y puede transmitirse a través de la placenta. [1,79,82] Los estudios han demostrado que la proteína de pico COVID-19 puede inducir la enfermedad de Parkinson en humanos. [26] La vacuna, en esencia, libera dosis masivas de la proteína espiga dentro del cuerpo, incluso en el cerebro y la médula espinal. Es importante destacar que la liberación, debido a la amplia distribución de los portadores de nanolípidos, se encuentra directamente dentro de cada tejido involucrado, maximizando así el daño. Esto es un desastre en ciernes. [4,7] En mi opinión, estas vacunas deberían suspenderse ahora antes de que muchas más resulten gravemente heridas o incluso muertas. [71,72]

Fuente: National Library of Medicine